A small, high‑confidence set of current domain registrations that clearly reference the Venezuela earthquake, likely a fraction of the wider registration activity the event has driven, profiled across creation dates, registrars, registrant emails, name servers and naming intent. A magnitude‑7.2 foreshock and magnitude‑7.5 mainshock struck north‑central Venezuela on 24 June 2026; 44% of these domains were filed on 25 June alone, the day after. Updated on 1 July: a differential capture adds the complete days of 29 and 30 June, 25 further registrations that bring the set to 237, up from 212 in the 29 June baseline. Full data access is available to verified organizations through our research and media collaborations program.
New registrations by creation date, charted from three days before the 24 June earthquake. Those three days show no registrations; the wave begins only after it and peaks the next day, with new names still being registered in the days since.
The set was assembled from names containing Venezuela markers (venezuela, vzla, plus affected places such as Caracas and La Guaira) alongside earthquake and aid vocabulary. Roughly a quarter pair a country marker directly with a quake term such as terremoto or sismo (51 domains).
93% of the set exposes no individual registrant mailbox, so shared-email clustering finds almost nothing. Registrations spread across 31 registrars with the largest holding 22%, and no single operator dominates — a pattern consistent with many independent registrants acting at once rather than one coordinated job.
The only registrant mailbox recurring across more than one domain in the set.
The infrastructure is the ordinary mix of consumer registrars, not a shared-account fingerprint.
How the registrations distribute across registrars, name-server providers and top-level domains.
Themes from keywords in the domain names. Aid, donation and rescue language dominates, alongside missing-person and emergency vocabulary. Themes overlap and describe apparent intent only.
“ These 237 domains are the high‑confidence matches, names that clearly point to the earthquake and likely a small share of what the event has driven. Most were filed in the first two days, with more arriving since. Many already resolve to live pages, donation drives and boards listing the missing, while others sit empty for now. A lot of it looks like real organizations and volunteers moving fast, but a wave like this, with more names likely behind it, is hard to vet. Some of the live pages are crypto-only, soliciting Bitcoin ‘for the victims’ with nothing to indicate the funds reach anyone. What separates the credible from the rest is confirming who runs a site, and whether a named missing person also appears on the established platforms and not only on a domain registered this week. ”
A representative 50‑domain sample with registrant emails masked. It preserves the TLD mix of the full set and covers every naming theme. Search and filter, click an email to pivot, and export the filtered view.
This explorer shows a 50‑record sample; all figures above are computed from the full 237‑domain set. Verified organizations can request the complete records, deeper WHOIS detail, historical data, and ongoing monitoring of these and related strings.
| Domain | Created | Registrar | Name server | Country | Registrant email | Themes |
|---|
This report draws on WhoisXML API’s domain and DNS intelligence, covering current domain registrations whose names reference the June 2026 Venezuela earthquake, together with their registration details. It combines two captures — a baseline taken 29 June and a differential taken 1 July 2026 — merged so each domain appears once, with registrar, name servers and expiry taken from the later capture and the creation date pinned to the earliest. The seed terms combined Venezuela markers with generic earthquake and seismic words (“earthquake”, “terremoto”, “sismo”); across both captures the pull returned 286 distinct domains, of which 241 reference Venezuela. 3 of those predate the earthquake — pre-existing domains that merely match the terms — and are excluded as out of window, leaving the 237 registered between 24 and 30 June as the basis of every figure here; 212 of these, registered through 28 June, made up the 29 June baseline. The remaining 45 match only the generic terms and, on review, reference earthquakes in other countries (Thailand, the Philippines, Chile, Italy, California) or earthquake-insurance services; at least 23 are such substring coincidences and are excluded. All figures are computed from the full 237-domain set; the explorer shows a representative 50-domain sample with registrant emails masked, and registrar names were normalized to merge variants of the same company. Registrant countries for privacy-proxied domains reflect the proxy service’s address (for example Iceland for one widely used service), not the registrant’s. Naming themes are derived from keywords and describe apparent intent only; inclusion in this report does not confirm affiliation with, or infringement of, any trademark, nor establish any connection to wrongdoing, and some domains may be legitimate relief, journalism, research, advocacy or commentary projects.